Plants

Announcements

Yesterday

Hi All,We discovered some issues affecting new user registration via the mobile app today:SymptomsWhen attempting to register, you may unexpectedly receive an unhelpful "web service error" message.Wor...


Continue reading

A handy feature

Calling all Moderators!

NatureMapr partners with NSW BCT on next phase of Land Libraries

Minor improvements

Discussion

LisaH wrote:
Yesterday
I think this is a Crowea?

Eriostemon australasius
RWPurdie wrote:
Yesterday
Solanum linearifolium and Solanum aviculare are superficially similar, both with lobed and unlobed leaves, but in the ACT the plant photographed will most likely be the former species, which also occurs on Black Mountain. Solanum aviculare is not included on the ACT plant census.

Solanum linearifolium
Csteele4 wrote:
Yesterday
@Tapirlord I missed your comment until just now, planning an excursion for tomorrow and checking out sightings. Saw your sighting, and I agree. I had not considered simplicicalus but it is a better fit.

Lobelia simplicicaulis
plants wrote:
Yesterday
Not trad. Looks like Pollia crispata, but there is no sale on the photos.

Dianella tasmanica
marcycad wrote:
1 Mar 2025
The flower spikes are over twice the length of the scapes, which is consistent in the population, therefore likely X. australis or X. glauca. If X. resinosa, I would expect to see the scape and spike length roughly even. The leaves/crowns are grey-green/glaucous coloured not green as would be expected in X. latifolia. The leaves also do not appear broad and have little flexion, which is always evident in X. latifolia on account of the very shallow and broad leaf cross-section shape.
If the area of this sighting were included, this would aid with a more accurate ID.

Xanthorrhoea sp.
826,677 sightings of 21,596 species from 13,445 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.